Å˽ðÁ«´«Ã½Ó³»­

Creating a new layer of federal oversight would neither enhance nor standardize the climate-related disclosures U.S. insurers make to investors, the Å˽ðÁ«´«Ã½Ó³»­ Information Institute (Triple-I) said sent today to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Triple-I’s letter came in response to the SEC’s request for public comment on its proposed rulemaking, “.”

“The U.S. property and casualty industry supports and can play a constructive role in advancing transparency around weather- and climate-related risks. Indeed, as financial first responders, insurers have a strong ethical and financial interest in facilitating the transition to a lower-carbon economy and in promoting resilience during that transition,” Sean Kevelighan, CEO, and Dale Porfilio, chief insurance officer, Triple-I wrote. “However, adding a new layer of federal oversight to the existing regulatory structure would complicate insurer operations while providing little to no benefit toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions and adapting to near-term conditions and perils.”

The U.S. insurance industry is regulated in more than 50 jurisdictions, receiving more governance and regulatory oversight than any other type of financial service. More than 80% of insurers’ investments are in fixed-income, mostly municipal, securities, the Triple-I noted.

“The SEC’s effort overlaps significantly with those of other entities – e.g., the National Association of Å˽ðÁ«´«Ã½Ó³»­ Commissioners (NAIC) and the states that regulate insurance, as well as the Treasury Department’s Federal Å˽ðÁ«´«Ã½Ó³»­ Office (FIO). Assessing Scope 3 emissions would be particularly onerous for insurers due to the fact that they cover diverse personal and commercial assets and activities, over which they have no control. Further, there is currently no accepted methodology for insurers to measure their underwriting-related Scope 3 emissions, which makes the SEC’s proposed requirement premature for our industry,” Kevelighan and Porfilio added.

are the result of activities from assets neither owned nor controlled by the reporting organization, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

In its letter submitted today to the SEC, Triple-I recommended that the NAIC serve as the primary reporting regime for all insurers, allowing for consistent enforcement across ownership structures (public, private, and mutual) while avoiding unnecessary complexity and expenses.

“Property and casualty insurers are no strangers to climate and extreme-weather risk. We may not always have talked about the issue in those terms, but our industry has long had a financial stake in the issue. Consider the fact that insured losses caused by natural disasters have grown by nearly 700% since the 1980s and that four of the five costliest natural disasters in U.S. history occurred over the past decade. The industry is committed to disclosure of climate-related exposures, as such information will be integral to insurers’ ability to accurately and reliably underwrite such risks and make better-informed investment decisions,” Kevelighan and Porfilio wrote.

SOURCE: Å˽ðÁ«´«Ã½Ó³»­ Information Institute